Pinkerton (as you should know) was Weezer's second album and least successful one.
The question continues: Why did it bomb?
"El Scorcho," the first single was not well received except in Australia. Many stations refused to play it.
WHAT I THINK: WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!??!
Catchy from first listen. Who cares if the time signature changes?! It sounds really great to me.
"The Good Life," failed to become completely popular, charted a little.
WHAT I THINK: Hhhmph
Maybe that was a bad idea. Great, great song but do people have the patience for it? Nowadays no one would, but even back then?
To try to get the album more popular, "Pink Triangle" was released. It did not chart.
WHAT I THINK: Well...
Pink Triangle is one of the best on the album (Across the Sea is my favorite), but I don't know if people wanted to digest this song. People may have been homophobic and uninviting to this song.
MY PERFECT PINKERTON SINGLE LIST:
Just an idea of what they should have done:
1st single: Why Bother?
This song is great in all areas, people would have loved it.
2nd single: The Good Life
If they liked Why Bother?, they would have the patience to want to listen to this.
3rd single: Across the Sea (or El Scorcho)
If people are liking the Nirvana stuff back then, they would love Across the Sea, and El Scorcho, same reason as Good Life, but only to be released if Good Life made it big.
I bought Pinkerton deluxe a few days ago but have only listened to the original album part. Planning on listening to the rest soon enough. Great album.
-Nathan
Tags: across, commercial, el, fail, failure, good, life, music, pinkerton, scorcho, More…sea, the, weezer, why
Permalink Reply by Kilmister [spaz] on May 23, 2011 at 2:59pm
Permalink Reply by Nathan on May 23, 2011 at 3:05pm I feel like you might have skipped this thread since you still think pinkerton is the least successful album
Permalink Reply by MrFrenchDog on May 23, 2011 at 3:15pm
Permalink Reply by kittens bieber ♥ on May 23, 2011 at 3:40pm does this question still continue?
anyone who was actually alive when pinkerton came out knows why it bombed: it wasn't what most people wanted or expected from weezer at the time. add that to the lack of any lasting promotion and the band being somewhat dysfunctional and it's pretty easy to understand why it performed so poorly. how is there any confusion over this?
Nathan said:
The question continues: Why did it bomb?
Permalink Reply by Sdawg on May 23, 2011 at 3:53pm this reminds me of this video for some reason
lulz
Permalink Reply by William D on May 23, 2011 at 4:18pm
Permalink Reply by Farkas on May 23, 2011 at 6:28pm this reminds me of this video for some reason
lulz
Permalink Reply by aO - r3tH>VHs H6i3l u3b - Bs on May 23, 2011 at 6:48pm
Permalink Reply by Farkas on May 23, 2011 at 7:13pm They didn't like it because it wasn't 'Blue: Part Two'.
Permalink Reply by =gregor= on May 24, 2011 at 7:56am V
Benjamin L. Shachter said:They didn't like it because it wasn't 'Blue: Part Two'.
Permalink Reply by Killamarshan on May 24, 2011 at 4:39pm Pinkerton didn't sound like Blue, Green Day, Nirvana or Sublime .. that's why it bombed on release.
It was an album that separated the wheat from the chaff of Weezer's fanbase and showed what hypocritical parasites music journalists really are.
Permalink Reply by kittens bieber ♥ on May 24, 2011 at 5:20pm Pinkerton didn't sound like Blue, Green Day, Nirvana or Sublime .. that's why it bombed on release.
It was an album that separated the wheat from the chaff of Weezer's fanbase and showed what hypocritical parasites music journalists really are.
© 2013 Created by Weezer.
